Name It / Change It: Just In Time For The New Year

in Essays

nameitchangeit full Name It / Change It: Just In Time For The New Year

Our heart­felt attempts at cheer and good­will this hol­i­day sea­son bark their knees—if they had knees—on reports like Name It. Change It. Just when we wanted to for­get all about misog­yny comes this por­tent reminder that it is always with us, espe­cially in the var­i­ous forms of media I attempt to ignore but which bathe our coun­try in a bath of vitriol.

How tragic it is that all these years after the resur­gence of the women’s move­ment in the 1970’s (and it had hardly lain dor­mant before that), we are still shy about nam­ing the dis­crim­i­na­tion we see on every hand! How many of us have silently wit­nessed drunken jibes, this sea­son, obliv­i­ous com­ments (all pro­fes­sion­als are still assumed to be he’s), com­pli­ments on our looks or clothes that carry con­de­scen­sion or even threat like a sting in their long sin­u­ous tails? Surely even those young women who insist that “all that” is a thing of the past have felt uncom­fort­able under the scrutiny of men in malls, streets, sub­ways, or have noticed as soon as they enter the job mar­ket that they are still sec­ond class cit­i­zens, last hired, first fired, still mak­ing a mis­er­able 77 cents to the dol­lar paid to men. And I sus­pect that, as domes­tic abuse increases and is blamed on the mis­ery of men out of work, women who retain their jobs will be blamed not only for con­tin­u­ing to work—robbing a good man who is only try­ing to sup­port his family!—but also for caus­ing the increase in assaults and battery.

Yet nam­ing it, in silence, while a worth­while first step, is only a pri­vate act. We are called on, now, to name it in pub­lic: to ques­tion pro­gres­sive move­ments like the var­i­ous Occupy groups that shove women to the side­lines (how often have you heard a woman inter­viewed from those encamp­ments?), lib­eral politi­cians whose most impor­tant asset is their wives, phi­lan­der­ing can­di­dates who espouse some­thing filmy called Family Values.

Letters to the Editor: yes.

Speaking out dur­ing social occa­sions when we will be met by a wall of silence, inap­pro­pri­ate jok­ing, or worse.

Constant, bone-wearying attempts to sup­port women candidates—but only those who openly oppose the sys­tem they are try­ing to enter: a con­tra­dic­tion in terms.

Well-meaning phil­an­thropy that treats poor women as col­o­nized sub­jects who should be grate­ful for our help.

Daughters and grand­daugh­ters grow­ing up in bliss­ful igno­rance (and this applies par­tic­u­larly to the priv­i­leged, fenced about with gates, pri­vate schools, resort vaca­tions, first class travel, hired help, and a soci­ety that endorses, applauds and admires priv­i­lege in all its forms), even when address­ing these top­ics in the perhaps-listening pres­ence of beloved girls raises hack­les and cre­ates divisions—

IS ALL THIS TOO MUCH TO ASK?

NOT WHEN WE SPEAK, AND ACT, TOGETHER.

Patty Pat, Spence Porter liked this post

View all of Sallie's online writing in her archives.

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: